Hoooooboy.
February 16th, 2010 Posted by Esther Inglis-ArkellThere was a huge upset, over at scans_daily, about a week ago. I know. How could that happen? But some of us like scans_daily, in part, because of the fights. This fight, however, frustrated me, because I’ve seen it too often.
I’ve seen a few too many arguments like this, lately, where someone does something dumb and offensive and then shouts at everyone who bothers to tell them that it’s offensive. Here are the arguments that they always, always, without fail, make.
1. But I didn’t know it was offensive.
2. But I didn’t mean it to be offensive.
3. But you should have been nicer to me when you explained what was wrong.
Number two has its variations (it was supposed to be funny, it was supposed to be satire, it’s not really important anyway), but number three? Number three is the catchall.
People who invoke number three will use any excuse in the book to make it work. They will use the excuse of politeness (there are certain ways we do things), and morality (don’t ever sink to their level!), and location (this isn’t the place for it), and loyalty (but I’m really on your side), and they love using practicality (You shouldn’t have to explain this but otherwise how will they learn? However will they learn?).
I hate all of those arguments, because all of them – every single thing I’ve listed above – boil down to this assumption:
You have consider my feelings, and I don’t have to consider yours.
That’s what every single person who ever makes those arguments is saying. That’s all they’re saying.
And when the original offender himself comes on in the second page to thank the people who ‘defended’ him, and not the people who acquiesced to the demands of all the idiots, waded thigh-deep into the bog, and educated him?
Man, I’m glad I can’t comment on that site since they moved to dreamwidth. Trying to get through to him would have been one hell of a waste of a few days.