And Now, Comic Book Math
February 19th, 2009 by Gavok | Tags: baraka, deadpool, movies, wolverineThat’s what it is according to the images of the toys for Wolverine: Origins. So far there’s a Superhero Squad figure and this guy:
“So who is this Deadpool guy?”
“He looks like Freddy Krueger and has Wolverine’s healing, but no claws.”
“We’re going to give him claws because it’s a Wolverine movie.”
“But, sir! If he has claws, that makes him too similar to Freddy Krueger!”
“Then we won’t make him look like Freddy Krueger anymore! Make him look like Zartan or something. What, do I have to think of everything?”
I seem to hate this design considerably less when I remember that Alex Hayden existed.
Maybe it’s just me, but that figure looks more like Sigma (Mega Man X series) + Baraka than Alex + Baraka.
by W4 February 19th, 2009 at 20:38 --replyAt least the comic series figure will actually look like Deadpool. But I guess this is what he’s going to look like in the movie, which doesn’t exactly bode well for the movie.
Of course, most things about that movie don’t bode well for that movie.
by Schide February 19th, 2009 at 21:18 --replyWow, that looks terrible.
by JL February 19th, 2009 at 22:06 --replyIf he looks like that in the movie, the only thing that could redeem it that I can think of is if the claws are actually machetes duct-taped to his forearms. Or maybe ginsu knives.
“And now I’m better at doing whatever it is Wolverine does!”
– Deadpool, leveling-up in Marvel: Ultimate Alliance
Oddly apropos.
by Ren February 19th, 2009 at 22:52 --replyIf you read the old origin stories of him in the old Deadpool ongoing, it kinda fits, if you accept the wrist blades as a failed attempt to make a second Wolverine.
Ultimately, he’s a fan service-y supporting character in a Wolverine movie. Given his powers, they were obviously going to tie him closer to Logan.
by Paul Wilson February 19th, 2009 at 23:53 --replyIf you are going to make fanservice by throwing in 3rd tier characters, why would you then not make them not that character? Suddenly everyone who gets who it is becomes annoyed. What’s the point?
by elfbot February 20th, 2009 at 03:31 --replyHe’s a wisecracking merc who gets horrifically scarred by Weapon X in the process of giving him a healing factor. You’re right, he’s not Deadpool, let’s call him Squirrel Girl!
We have shots of a toy without context, it’s a little early to suggest they haven’t got the character right. Was there this much pf a negative reaction when they took Toad out of the jester’s costume?
(Side note, I was actually about to ask if there was this much of negative reaction when they made Mystique effectively nude. Then I realised no, there was not.)
by Paul Wilson February 20th, 2009 at 05:00 --reply@Paul Wilson:
What kind of sicko would complain about a nude supermodel?
I won’t be satisfied with this Deadpool design unless he specifically tied those blades to his own arms.
by Strontosaurus February 20th, 2009 at 06:30 --replyWell, the one saving grace of this is that it could be a fake. What makes me think that? It looks nothing like Ryan Reynolds.
by rizzo February 20th, 2009 at 07:50 --replyIs this definitely Deadpool, then? Cos I don’t see the name on the box. I know the film features a character called Weapon XI, so maybe that’s who this is? Isn’t it a bit moot though, since Deadpool didn’t start wearing that masked suit till after he left the program anyway?
by Stuart February 20th, 2009 at 09:00 --reply“Cos I don’t see the name on the box.”
by Probe February 20th, 2009 at 09:55 --replyNotice the “…pool tm” on the left side?
Nah, that Fred Pool, his cousin. Only explanation I will accept.
by Simon K February 20th, 2009 at 12:00 --reply@Strontosaurus: This was my thought as I was writing it.
That said, much as I like Deadpool, even if they turn him into a clawed, failed Wolverine knock-off, it won’t diminish my enjoyment of the comics one iota. Kelly and Simone did a lot of fun stuff with a character which basically started as the bastard child of Deathstroke and Spiderman as imagined by “auteur” Rob Liefeld.
I’m kinda past the stage of expecting them to slavishly copy the characters in the comic book. If he heals, looks ugly and manages a few wisecracks, then I’ll accept it as the movie version of Deadpool. Obsessing over details makes you no better than the “WTF? Leiv Schreiber looks nothing like Tyler Mane!” crowd.
by Paul Wilson February 21st, 2009 at 00:42 --replyI like Deadpool, don’t expect much from this movie, and can’t bring myself to care about this. If they do the character well, it doesn’t matter if he’s got knives tied onto his arms or not. If not, it doesn’t matter either. Personally, I’m looking forward to seeing Reynolds in a comics movie where his schtick is closer to the character.
by Jbird February 22nd, 2009 at 17:44 --reply