
Motion Comics
September 5th, 2009 Posted by Esther Inglis-ArkellI’ve been looking at the various trailers for motion comics at amazon.com, trying to come up with a consistent opinion on them, and failing completely.
Some, like The Astonishing X-men, look just atrocious. The figures move like bobble-heads, the zooming of the camera doesn’t let you appreciate the art and the voice acting is flat and unpleasant.
Others have better production values but seem misguided. Batgirl: Year One, though a great story, doesn’t lend itself to motion comics. The many flashbacks were difficult to assimilate in the book and just look confused when there’s visual differentiation between present and past, no time to linger, and the camera won’t stop moving. Also, the voices are way off, with Babs sounding sixteen and James Gordon coming off as angry and repressive, instead of good-natured but over-protective.
Comics like Mad Love and Watchmen, no matter how well done, are just redundant. Mad Love was already both an episode of the TV show and a comic. Obviously it’s a popular story, but it’s a story that has been told frame-for-frame in two different kinds of media. Motion comics split the difference without adding anything. If you want to see the art, pick up the comic. If you want to see the story, buy the actual episode of the show. Same with Watchmen. We have a movie and a comic. A motion comic is overkill.
That being said? I want those Batman: Black and Whiteepisodes. I want them baaaaad.



